Imagine a compliance platform costs you $12,000 per year. Does it cost a lot?
The answer will depend on the product it is replacing.
If technology can eliminate hundreds of hours of tedious evidence collection in a tangled technology environment, $12,000 could be a wise investment. If a small business with seven employees could gather similar evidence in just only a few hours each month, the calculation differs.
It’s a smart approach to start your search for the Vanta alternative. Don’t begin by asking which one has the most features. Ask your company about how these features will help you save time and money.
Automation Can be a Break-Even Economic Factor
It’s not necessarily either good or bad. Its value changes with scale. Imagine a tech company which is growing, numerous cloud environments, many applications, and constant changes to access. The manual process of collecting evidence can be a major operational burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and gather evidence can easily justify the cost.
Consider a startup with 10 employees preparing for their first SOC 2. Consider a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
This distinction is crucial when evaluating Vanta’s pricing. The capabilities of a modern platform are impressive, however they only provide financial value when an organization needs them.
Compare Architecture with Brands, not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both platforms are built on automation and integration with each other, which means that companies looking for this kind of solution can benefit by comparison of the frameworks that are supported with their integrations, service and individual quotes and contracts.
It’s important to choose something else first. Do you need a system for compliance that is integrated? Certain businesses want continuous monitoring and automated evidence collection. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence themselves.
Vanta Competitors aren’t all following the same model
Several well-known Vanta rivals have a place in the market, with a similar focus on automation. On the market, there are platforms with a lighter design that are more focused on organization rather as opposed to connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the second group. The product was created by compliance consultants as well as internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central workspace, provides editable policy and evidence guidance, and permits auditors to look over evidence via read-only access.
It doesn’t connect to operational systems or create infrastructure agents. Customers upload their own proof.
System Access is a consideration in the Making
Eliminating integrations has a distinct disadvantage: one must collect evidence manually.
This means that there is no need to integrate and the implementation of compliance is not dependent on a connection to the operating environment.
The designs of either are not superior to the other. It is essential to consider which choices are best to your business.
CertAssist is targeted towards teams of five to 200 employees and provides pricing information instead of having the sales pitch. The launch price is $225 monthly, which compares to the regular cost of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
Today’s needs for a startup with 10 employees aren’t necessarily exactly the same as the company that has 100 or 500 employees.
While compliance is simple but a lighter platform might be a good idea. As systems, employees, frameworks, and requirements for evidence increase, the financials could ultimately favor more automation. Let complexity be the primary factor when purchasing compliance technology.
Don’t pay for fifty integrations simply because they look attractive in a chart of comparison. Pay for them when manually doing the job they replace becomes the most expensive option.